Webové stránky věnované nejen biopotravinám a ekologickému zemědělství, ale i ekologii samotné. Je nutné o naší planetu citlivě pečovat, protože máme jen jednu!
2012-05-13, anonymous commands, wnignut (despite craven nature) obeys Dan's post:Murphy says casino opponents plied him with information. Like most of my colleagues, I read it all, he writes. The fiends!Murphy's actual post:On the casino issue it was not terribly difficult to do the homework due to the amout of information we were inundated with on both sides of the issue. Like most of my colleagues, I read it all.Both sides inundated Murphy with information. Nothing fiendish there. Presuming the research page at casinofacts.org to be part of the information casino opponents plied Murphy and his colleagues with, the page includes a link to this document: . It contains more than 100 pages of references. I've gone through and read the summaries of most of them. Mostly they're disappointingly inconclusive. As is , at least according to its abstract. Do you think Murphy (or anyone else) has read all those studies?Depending on what your definition of all is, Murphy is speaking figuratively. If Hillary had made the remark of course, it would be a lie! What he presumably means is, my position was originally X, then at a certain point, after reading {some burdensome amount of material dumped on my desk by both sides, or links sent via email}, I changed my mind and took the position anti-X.That's of course perfectly legitimate and I respect his conclusion. However from that you cannot imply:1. P (implication: unlike you) has read all the information.2. P concludes X.3. X is the legitimate conclusion, based on all the information.For two reasons:* P didn't, nor has anyone, actually read it all .* Different people exposed to the same research can legitimately come to different conclusions in good faith.If no such implication is meant by the posting, then the only point being made is, Rep. Murphy denies submitting to partisan pressure and claims instead to have come to his own conclusions which is, a.) fair enough, and b.) a dog bites man story.
